Social aspects of rehabilitation of the Bryansk region settlements affected by the Chernobyl NPP accident

Relevance. Currently, in the south-west of the Bryansk region, the settlements most affected by the Chernobyl NPP accident show the radiation exposure of about 30 % of the natural level without causing any negative impact on health. However, the settlements are still facing severe social challenges. Throughout the timespan after the Chernobyl accident, significant population decline has been observed in these settlements. Over the past 20 years, the number of residential settlements in the south-west districts of the Bryansk region has decreased by 22 % and the number of residents by 16%. Considering the long-lasting consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, social protection of the accident affected population and the development of radioactively contaminated areas remains relevant so far.

The objective is to assess the current demographic situation in the Bryansk region southwestern settlements, most affected by the Chernobyl NPP accident, as well as to justify the shortage of social infrastructure required to ensure the settlements return back to normal conditions.

Methods. The study analyses current social problems, including demographics and infrastructure in the five southwestern districts of the Bryansk region, most affected by the Chernobyl NPP accident.

Results and discussion. In 2023, the southwestern districts of the Bryansk region included 72 residential settlements (71 rural and the town of Novozybkov) with an average annual effective radiation dose of population exposure above 1 mSv. The total registered population of the settlements is 63,869 people. The share of rural and urban population is 39 and 61 %, respectively. A difficult demographic situation was noted in the populated areas of the Chernobyl accident zone. Thus, the share of persons under working age (0–15 years) does not exceed 17 % of the total population. Social infrastructure demands were assessed to ensure wellbeing of the population in the Bryansk region districts, most affected by the Chernobyl NPP accident.

Conclusion. In the rural settlements where the population is exposed to an average annual effective radiation dose above 1 mS, assessment and audit of the existing social infrastructure is required with follow-up efforts to eliminate the shortages, if any, to comply with modern norms and standards.

1. Aleksakhin R.M., Sanzharova N.I., Panov A.V. Reabilitatsionnyye meropriyatiya v agropromyshlennom komplekse kak osnova sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territoriy, podvergshikhsya vozdeystviyu avarii na Chernobyl’skoy AES [Rehabili tation measures – as a basis for socioeconomic development in areas subject to exposure by accident at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii sel’skokhozyaystvennykh nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences]. 2009; (6):28–30. (In Russ.)

2. Atlas sovremennykh i prognoznykh aspektov posledstviy avarii na Chernobyl’skoy AES na postradavshikh territoriyakh Rossii i Belarusi (ASPA Rossiya-Belarus’) [Atlas of modern and predictive aspects of the consequences of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the affected territories of Russia and Belarus (ASPA Russia–Belarus)]. Eds.: Yu.A. Izrael, I.M. Bogdevich. Moscow: Minsk. 2009. 140 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bruk G.Y., Romanovich I.K., Bazyukin A.B. [et al.]. Sredniye godovyye effektivnyye dozy oblucheniya v 2017 godu zhite ley naselennykh punktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii, otnesennykh k zonam radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya vsledstviye katastrofy na Chernobyl’skoy AES (dlya tseley zonirovaniya naselennykh punktov) [The average annual effective doses for the population of the settlements of the Russian Federation attributed to zones of radioactive contamination due to the Chernobyl accident (for the zonation purposes), 2017]. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena [Radiation Hygiene]. 2017; 10(4):73–78. DOI: 10.21514/1998-426X2017-10-4-73-78. (In Russ.)

4. Gerasimova N.V., Abalkina I.L., Marchenko T.A. [et al.]. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye posledstviya chernobyl’skoy avarii (na primere Bryanskoy oblasti) [Socio-economic consequences of the Chernobyl accident (on the example of the Bryansk region)]. Moscow. 2006. 32 p.

5. Ivanyuga T.V., Dyachenko O.V. O bednosti v Brjanskoj oblasti i merah po ee snizheniju [On poverty in the Bryansk region and measures to reduce it]. Vestnik agrarnoj nauki [Bulletin of agrarian science]. 2021; (2):119–128. DOI: 10.17238/issn2587-666X.2021.2.119 (In Russ.)

6. Kozlov V.N., Talalushkina Yu.N. Reabilitacija kak faktor social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija territorij radioaktivnogo zagrjaznenija [Rehabilitation as a factor of socio-economic development of territories with radioactive contamination]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University]. 2008; (7):72–76. (In Russ.)

7. Kubyshkin A.V., Korosteleva O.N., Khvostenko T.M. Social’no-jekonomicheskie pokazateli urovnja zhizni naselenija Brjanskoj oblasti [Socio-economic level indicators life of the population of the Bryansk region]. Upravlencheskij uchet [Management Accounting]. 2008; (3-2):354–359. (In Russ.)

8. Marchenko T.A., Kuchmezov Kh.Kh., Petrov S.V. [et al.]. Rezul’taty provedeniya kompleksnykh obsledovaniy naselen nykh punktov, nakhodyashchikhsya v granitsakh zon radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya vsledstviye avarii na ChAES [The results of the integrated area surveys located within the zones of radioactive contamination as a result of the Chernobyl accident]. Tekhnologii grazhdanskoy bezopasnosti [Civil Security Technology]. 2016; 13(3):20–24. (In Russ.)

9. Marchenko T.A., Melnitskaya T.B., Belykh T.V. Otsenka sotsial’no-psikhologicheskikh posledstviy perezhivaniya radiatsi onnoy opasnosti u raznykh vozrastnykh grupp naseleniya, prozhivayushchego na radioaktivno-zagryaznennoy territorii Rossii [Assessment of social and psychological consequences of radiation danger experience among different age groups of the population from contaminated areas of Russia]. Radiatsionnaya Gygiena [Radiation Hygiene]. 2012; 5(4):21–25. (In Russ.)

10. Panov A.V. Vozvrashhenie radioaktivno zagrjaznennyh territorij k normal’noj zhiznedejatel’nosti: sovremennye problemy i puti reshenija (k 35-letiju avarii na Chernobyl’skoj AJeS) [Returning radioactively contaminated territories to normal life: current problems and ways for solution (35 years after the Chernobyl NPP accident)]. Mediko-biologicheskie i social’nopsihologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychajnyh situacijah [Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations]. 2021; (1):5–13. DOI: 10.25016/2541-7487-2021-0-1-05-13 (In Russ.)

11. Panov A.V., Komarova L.N., Lyapunova E.R. [et al.]. Osobennosti formirovanija dozovyh nagruzok na naselenie naibo lee postradavshih posle chernobyl’skoj avarii rajonov Rossii [Peculiarities of the exposure dose formation on the population in the most affected regions of Russia after the Chernobyl NPP accident]. Izvestiya vuzov. Yadernaya Energetika [Nuclear Energy and Technology]. 2023; (3):73–84. DOI: 10.26583/npe.2023.3.06 (In Russ.)

12. Talalushkina Yu.N. Kachestvo zhizni naselenija territorij radioaktivnogo zagrjaznenija [Life quality of population on the territory of radioactive pollution]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University]. 2008; (8):46–49. (In Russ.)

13. Talalushkina Yu.N. Teoreticheskie voprosy upravlenija razvitiem i reabilitaciej territorij radioaktivnogo zagrjaznenija [Theoretical issues of managing the development and rehabilitation of territories with radioactive contamination]. Regional’naja jekonomika: teorija i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice]. 2009; (41):70–75. (In Russ.)

14. Shamratova I.A., Petukhova M.E., Goryachev E.A. Kompleksnyj podhod k podgotovke naselenija k izmeneniju radiacionnogo statusa territorij, zagrjaznennyh v rezul’tate avarii na Chernobyl’skoj AJeS [An integrated approach to preparing the population to a change of the radiation status of territories contaminated due to the Chernobyl accident]. Tehnologii grazhdanskoj bezopasnosti [Civil Security Technology]. 2018; 15(2): 30–37. DOI: 10.54234/CST.19968493.2018.15.2.56.5.30. (In Russ.)