Preview

Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations

Advanced search

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in blood serum of patients with traumatic brain injury

https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2021-0-4-78-84

Abstract

Relevance. Head injuries in Russia are the most significant cause of death in emergencies and road traffic accidents, as well as disability of victims. Neurospecific proteins such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are markers of neural tissue damage and blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Blood serum GFAP analysis can become a possible noninvasive method to assess brain injury severity and prognosis.

Intention. To analyze GFAP levels in blood serum of patients having central nervous system traumas of varying severity as well as the injury outcomes.

Methodology. GFAP levels were measured in the blood serum of 47 patients with traumatic brain injury before their treatment and in 42 apparently healthy donors using immunoenzyme method (Human GFAP ELISA, BioVendor, USA).

Results and Discussion. GFAP detection frequency was 38.3 % (18 out of 47 people) for the group of patients with traumatic brain injury, while the marker was nearly undetectable in the control group. There were statistically significant differences in serum GFAP levels depending on severity and outcome. The basal average marker concentration in the group with poor outcome was 10 times higher than in patients with a favorable outcome.

Conclusion. GFAP is a potential marker to assess severity and prognosis of traumatic brain injur

About the Authors

N. V. Lyubimova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Nina V. Lyubimova – Dr. Biol. Sci. Prof., Lead Researcher

24, Kashirskoye Highway, Moscow, 115478



Yu. S. Timofeev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Yurii S. Timofeev, Cand. Med. Sci, Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics Doctor

24, Kashirskoye Highway, Moscow, 115478



A. Kh. Bekyashev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Ali Kh. Bekyashev – Dr. Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Neurosurgery

24, Kashirskoye Highway, Moscow, 115478



N. N. Zybina
Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia N. Zybina – Dr. Biol. Sci., Prof., Head of the Department of Laboratory Diagnostics

4/2, Academic Lebedeva Str., St.-Petersburg, 194044



I. S. Stilidi
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Ivan S. Stilidi – Dr Med. Sci Prof., Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

24, Kashirskoye Highway, Moscow, 115478



N. E. Kushlinskii
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Nikolay E. Kushlinskii – Dr Med. Sci Prof., Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry

24, Kashirskoye Highway, Moscow, 115478



References

1. Lyubimova N.V., Timofeev Yu.S., Kushlinskii N.E. Nespetsificheskie belki v syvorotke krovi u bol’nykh s opukholyami golovnogo mozga i nevrologicheskimi zabolevaniyami neopukholevoi etiologii [Neurospesific proteins in the serum of patients with brain tumors and neurological diseases of non-tumor ethiology]. Mediko-biologicheskie i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh. [Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations]. 2016. N 3. Pp. 90–95. DOI: 10.25016/2541-7487-2016-0-3-90-95. (In Russ.)

2. Kovtun N.A., Savelyeva M.I., Trophimenko A.V. [et al.]. Diagnosticheskoe i prognosticheskoe znachenie opredeleniya belkov – markerov povrezhdeniya mozga pri legkikh cherepno-mozgovykh travmakh [Diagnostic and prognostic value of protein markers determination of brain damage in mild traumatic brain injuries]. Laboratornaya sluzhba [Laboratory Service]. 2021. N 2. Pp. 28–33. DOI: 10.17116/labs20211002128. (In Russ.)

3. Baumgarten P., Quick-Weller J., Gessler F. [et al.]. Pre- and early postoperative GFAP serum levels in glioma and brain metastases. J. Neurooncol. 2018. Vol. 139, N 3. Pp. 541–546. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2898-1.

4. Bazarian J.J., Biberthaler P., Welch R.D. [et al.]. Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2018. Vol. 17, N 9. Pp. 782–789. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30231-X.

5. Brommeland T., Rosengren L., Fridlund S. [et al.]. Serum levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein correlate to tumour volume of high-grade gliomas. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2007. Vol. 116, N 6. Pp. 380–384. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00889.x.

6. Foerch C., Niessner M., Back T. [et al.]. Diagnostic accuracy of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia in patients with symptoms of acute stroke. Clin. Chem. 2012. Vol. 58, N 1. Pp. 237–245. DOI:10.1373/clinchem.2011.172676.

7. Gállego Pérez-Larraya J., Paris S., Idbaih A. [et al.]. Diagnostic and prognostic value of preoperative combined GFAP, IGFBP-2, and YKL-40 plasma levels in patients with glioblastoma. Cancer. 2014. Vol. 120, N 24. Pp. 3972–3980. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28949.

8. Hiskens M.I., Schneiders A.G., Angoa-Pérez M. [et al.]. Blood biomarkers for assessment of mild traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Biomarkers. 2020. Vol. 25, N 3. Pp. 213–227. DOI: 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1735521.

9. Kiviniemi A., Gardberg M., Frantzén J. [et al.]. Serum levels of GFAP and EGFR in primary and recurrent high-grade gliomas: correlation to tumor volume, molecular markers, and progression-free survival. J. Neurooncol. 2015. Vol. 124, N 2. Pp. 237–245. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1829-7.

10. Lewis L.M., Papa L., Bazarian J.J. [et al.]. Biomarkers may predict unfavorable neurological outcome after mild traumatic brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2020. Vol. 37, N 24. Pp. 2624–2631. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7071.

11. Lumpkins K.M., Bochicchio G.V., Keledjian K. [et al.]. Glial fibrillary acidic protein is highly correlated with brain injury. J. Trauma. 2008. Vol. 65, N 4. P. 778–782. Discussion 782–784. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318185db2d.

12. Lyubimova N.V., Timofeev Y.S., Mitrofanov A.A. [et al.]. Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Malignant Glial Tumors. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020. Vol. 168, N 4. Pp. 503–506. DOI: 10.1007/s10517-020-04741-9.

13. Mayer C.A., Brunkhorst R., Niessner M. [et al.]. Blood levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in patients with neurological diseases. PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8, N 4. P. e62101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062101.

14. Papa L., Brophy G.M., Welch R.D. [et al.]. Time course and diagnostic accuracy of glial and neuronal blood biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients with and without mild traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 2016. Vol. 73, N 5. Pp. 551–560. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0039.

15. Pelinka L.E., Kroepfl A., Leixnering M., Buchinger W. [et al]. GFAP versus S100B in serum after traumatic brain injury: relationship to brain damage and outcome. J. Neurotrauma. 2004. Vol. 21, N 11. Pp. 1553–1561. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1553.

16. Petzold A. Glial fibrillary acidic protein is a body fluid biomarker for glial pathology in human disease. Brain Res. 2015. Vol. 1600. Pp. 17–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.12.027.

17. Seidenfaden S.C., Kjerulff J.L., Juul N. [et al.]. Diagnostic accuracy of prehospital serum S100B and GFAP in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational multicenter cohort study – “the PreTBI I study”. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2021. Vol. 29, N 1. Pp. 75. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00891-5.

18. Takala R.S., Posti J.P., Runtti H. [et al.]. Glial Fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 as outcome predictors in traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 2016. Vol. 87. Pp. 8–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.066.

19. Tichy J., Spechtmeyer S., Mittelbronn M. [et al.]. Prospective evaluation of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a diagnostic marker for glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 2016. Vol. 126, N 2. Pp. 361–369. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1978-8.

20. Vos P.E., Jacobs B., Andriessen T.M. [et al.]. GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study. Neurology. 2010. Vol. 75, N 20. Pp. 1786–1793. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd62d2.

21. Welch R.D., Ayaz S.I., Lewis L.M. [et al.]. Ability of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1, and S100B To Differentiate Normal and Abnormal Head Computed Tomography Findings in Patients with Suspected Mild or Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2016. Vol. 33, N 2. Pp. 203–214. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.4149.


Review

For citations:


Lyubimova N.V., Timofeev Yu.S., Bekyashev A.Kh., Zybina N.N., Stilidi I.S., Kushlinskii N.E. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in blood serum of patients with traumatic brain injury. Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2021;(4):78-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2021-0-4-78-84

Views: 585


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4441 (Print)
ISSN 2541-7487 (Online)