Genetic predictors of destructive and constructive types of digital behavior among young people

Relevance. In the context of globalization, manifestations of extremism, negativism, aggression, asocial and dissocial behavior on the Internet tend to increase. However, biological determinants of destructive and constructive forms and transformations of users’ behavior are under debate.

Intention – To study genetic predictors of digital behavior among young adults.

Methodology. The study involved 115 people (51 males, 64 females) aged 18 to 22 years. In order to study the digital behavior, we used the author’s questionnaire “Strategies of digital behavior”. Molecular genetic analysis was performed through the DNA isolation from buccal epithelial cells. Statistical methods included comparative analysis, very simple structure method (VSS), principal component analysis, and ANOVA.

Results and Discussion. It is shown that in most respondents active conditionally “constructive” digital behaviors prevail (45 %), active “destructive” and passive conditionally “constructive” digital behaviors are expressed almost equally (27 and 28 %, respectively). The active-destructive digital behavior is significantly more often observed in carriers of the combination of BDNF G/G, COMT G/A, and DRD2 T/T polymorphisms. For the constructive digital behaviors, neither biological determinants nor associations with the studied genes were observed.

Conclusion. The above associations of COMT, BDNF, and DRD2 genes with the behavioral strategies of Internet users expand the existing knowledge about biological determinants of digital behavior.

1. Ermakov P.N., Abakumova I.V., Shteinbukh A.G. Profilaktika ekstremizma i terroristicheskogo povedeniya molodezhi v internet-prostranstve: traditsionnye i innovatsionnye formy [Prevention of extremism and terrorist behavior of youth in the Internet space: traditional and innovative forms]. Moskva. 2018. 76 p.

2. Kovsh E.M., Ermakov P.N., Vorob’eva E.V. Osobennosti vyzvannoi aktivnosti mozga pri otsenke emotsional’no okrashennykh stsen u devushek s raznymi genotipami polimorfizma Val158Met (G472A) COMT [Peculiarities of the evoked brain activity in ranking the emotionally charged scenes by women with different genotypes of VAL158MET (G472A) COMT polymorphism]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg university. Series 16. Psychology. Pedagogy]. 2016. Iss. 3. Pp. 168–177. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.315.

3. Ahuja V., Alavib S. Cyber psychology and cyber behaviour of adolescents-the need of the contemporary era. Procedia Computer Science. 2017. Vol. 122. Pp. 671–676. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.422.

4. Arana A., Guarneri-White M., Boyd E. [et al.]. Peer victimization and physical health symptoms: The role of inflammatory markers. Merrill Palmer Quarterly. 2018. Vol. 64, N 1. Special Issue: The Neurobiology of Peer Victimization. Pp. 11–21.

5. Caplan S., Williams D., Yee N. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being among MMO players. Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. Vol 25, N 6. Pp. 1312–1319. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.006.

6. Castreˆn E., Rantamaki T. Role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the aetiology of depression. CNS drugs. 2010. Vol. 24, N 1. Pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.2165/11530010-000000000-00000.

7. Gohier B., Senior C., Radua J. [et al.]. Genetic modulation of the response bias towards facial displays of anger and happiness. European Psychiatry. 2014. Vol. 29, N 4. Pp. 197–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.03.003.

8. Golimbet V.E., Garakh Z.V., Zaytseva Y. [et al.]. The Dopamine Receptor D2 C957T Polymorphism Modulates Early Components of Event-Related Potentials in Visual Word Recognition Task. Neuropsychobiology. 2018. Vol. 76, N 3. Pp. 143–150. DOI: 10.1159/000489712.

9. Han D.H., Lee Y.S., Yang K.C. [et al.]. Dopamine Genes and Reward Dependence in Adolescents with Excessive Internet Video Game Play. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2007. Vol. 1, N 3. Pp. 133–138. DOI: 10.1097/adm.0b013e31811f465f.

10. John A., Glendenning A.C., Marchant A. [et al.]. Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People: Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018. Vol. 20, N 4. Art. e129. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9044.

11. Sariyska R., Reuter M., Sindermann C. [et al.]. The DRD2 gene and Internet addiction revisited. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2018. Vol. 7, N 1 Pp. 137–137.

12. Sindermann C., Markett S., Jung S. [et al.]. Genetic Variation of COMT Impacts Mindfulness and Self-Reported Everyday Cognitive Failures but Not Self-Rated Attentional Control. Mindfulness. 2018. Vol. 9, N 5. Pp. 1479–1485. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-018-0893-4.

13. Van Dongen J.D.M., Van Schaik R.H.N., Van Fessem M. [et al.]. Association between the COMT Val158Met polymorphism and aggression in psychosis: Test of a moderated mediation model in a forensic inpatient sample. Psychology of Violence. 2018. Vol. 8, N 2. Pp. 269–276. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000119.