Application of time to emesis data for primary triage of radiation accident victims

Relevance. The relevance of the study is due to the risk of developing large-scale radiation accidents with a large number of victims, who will need primary medical triage and early prediction of the severity of injury for correct routing from the source of sanitary losses.
Intention. Validation of the method of estimating dose by time-to-emesis under various exposure conditions for pre-hospital triage of victims.
Methodology. The object of the study is the data from State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency (Moscow) database of acute radiation injuries.
Results and Discussion: We have analyzed individual data for the victims of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (114 persons) with a separate analysis of the irradiation conditions (short-term exposure for less than 20 minutes and prolonged exposure in selected groups), as well as the data from victims of other radiation accidents in the former USSR (26 persons) and 8 patients with total body radiotherapy without the use of antiemetics. It was shown that for the equal time-to-emesis intervals, predicted radiation injury is more severe in case of prolonged exposure vs short-term exposure. This may be due to varying rate of dose accumulation and so-called “unnecessary dose” effect – when the biological mechanism of vomiting has already been triggered against ongoing exposure. Results are presented as interval estimates of radiation injury severity by time-to-emesis for both short-term and prolonged exposures. We also have formulated two criteria for primary triage purposes in case of moderate or large numbers of victims due to large-scale radiation accidents.
Conclusion. Recommendations for pre-hospital triage of victims are proposed.

1. Radiacionnaya medicina. [Radiologic Medicine]. Ed. L.A. Ilyin. Moscow. 2001. T. 2. Radiacionnye porazheniya cheloveka [Vol. 2. Radiologic human injuries]. Vol. 2. 432 p. (In Russ.)

2. Soloviev V.Yu. Matematicheskie metody i modeli v avarijnoj dozimetrii, radiacionnoj medicine i radiacionnoj epidemiologii [Mathematical Methods and Models in Emergency Dosimetry, Radiation Medicine and Radiation Epidemiology]. Moscow. 2016. 120 p (In Russ.)

3. Soloviev V.Yu., Krasnyuk V.I., Fatkina S.S. Baza dannyh po ostrym luchevym porazheniyam cheloveka. Soobshchenie

4. Zakonomernosti formirovaniya pervichnoj reakcii pri otnositel’no ravnomernom avarijnom obluchenii [Human Database on Acute Radiation Damages. Part 4. Primary Reaction Regularities on Total Body Accidental Irradiation]. Medicinskaya radiologiya i radiacionnaya bezopasnost’ [Medical radiology and radiation safety]. 2014. Vol. 59, N 4. Pp. 32–40. (In Russ.)

5. Sotnik N.V., Rybkina V.L., Azizova T.V. Novie podkhodi v biologicheskoy dozimetrii: sozdanie komplexnih biodozimetricheskih sistem (obzor zarubezhnoj literatury) [New approaches to biological dosimetry: development of complex biodosimetric systems (review of foreign literature)]. Mediko-biologicheskie i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh [Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations]. 2018. N 4. Pp. 90–96. DOI: 10.25016/2541-7487-2018-0-4-90-96 (In Russ.)

6. About Time to Onset of Vomiting – Radiation Emergency Medical Management. URL: https://www.remm.nlm.gov/aboutvomiting.htm#illustration.

7. Anno G.H., Baum S.J., Withers H.R., Young R.W. Symptomatology of Acute Radiation Effects in Humans after Exposure to Doses of 0,5–30 Gy. Health Phys. 1989. Vol. 56. Pp. 821–838. DOI: 10.1097/00004032-198906000-00001.

8. Atlas. Acute Radiation Syndrome. Eds.: A.S. Samoilov, V.Yu. Soloviev. Moscow. 2019. 232 p.

9. Demidenko E., Williams B.B., Swartz H.M. Radiation Dose Prediction using Data on Time to Emesis in the Case of Nuclear Terrorism. Rad. Res. 2009. Vol. 171, N 3. Pp. 310–319. DOI: 10.1667/RR1552.1.

10. Donnelly E.H., Nemhauser J.B., Smith J.M. [et al.]. Acute Radiation Syndrome: Assessment and Management. Southern Medical Journal. 2010. Vol. 103, N 6. Pp. 541–546. DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181ddd571.

11. Goans R.E., Holloway E.C., Berger M.E., Ricks R.C. Early Dose Assessment in Criticality Accidents. Health Phys. 2001. Vol. 81. Pp. 446–449. DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200110000-00009.

12. Goans R.E., Waselenko J.K. Medical Management of Radiological Casualties. Health Phys. 2005. Vol. 89. Pp. 505–512. DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000172144.94491.84.

13. International Atomic Energy Agency, World Health Organization. Diagnosis and Treatment of Radiation Injuries. Safety Reports Series N 2. Vienna: IAEA, 1998. 49 p. URL: https://www.iaea.org/publications/5135/.

14. Parker D.D., Parker J.C. Estimating Radiation Dose from Time to Emesis and Lymphocyte Depletion. Health Phys. 2007. Vol. 93, N 6. Pp. 701–704. DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000275289.45882.29.

15. Sandgren D.J., Salter C.A., Levine I.H. [et al.]. Biodosimetry Assessment Tool (BAT) software – Dose Prediction Algorithms. Health Phys. 2010. Vol. 99, N 5. Pp. 171–183. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f0fe6c.

16. Soloviev V.Yu., Barabanova A.V., Bushmanov A.Yu. [et al.]. Review of the Radiation Accidents Consequences in the Former USSR Territory. Medical radiology and radiation safety. 2014. Vol. 59, N 4. Pp. 32–40.

17. Waselenko J.K., MacVittie T.J., Blakely W.F. [et al.]. Medical Management of the Acute Radiation Syndrome: Recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004. Vol. 140, N 12. Pp. 1037–1051. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-12-200406150-00015.

18. Woolbarst A.B., Wiley A.L., Nemhauser J.B. [et al.]. Medical Response to a Major Radiologic Emergency: a Primer for Medical and Public Health Practitioners. Radiology. 2010. Vol. 254, N 3. Pp. 660–677. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090330.